Low/Medium/High Volume

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
chedog
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun May 17, 2015 4:37 pm

Low/Medium/High Volume

Postby chedog » Sat Sep 26, 2015 1:06 am

It occurred to me today, as I was reading continuing discussions of volume in the surgeon's repertoire, that I wasn't clear how we were using the term.

So can someone enlighten me:

    What is high volume?

    What is low volume?

    What is the range for medium volume?

dg_moore
Posts: 1885
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:34 am

Re: Low/Medium/High Volume

Postby dg_moore » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:15 am

Nobody knows exactly how many implants all docs perform, so you can't reallly establish exactly what high/medium/low means. I think a doc who does maybe 5 a week would be in the high range, 2 a week medium, and any less low. But the real high volume guys do many more - maybe 10 or 20 a week. In any case, the more experienced and skilled the surgeon, the less likely a poor outcome. Traveling to a good surgeon is a better bet than taking a chance with somebody local with a more modest track record.
Dave, 80, Maryland - Implant (Titan) 2008 by Dr. Andrew Kramer (failed Sept 2020) - never used due to a stroke that, among other things, ended my sex life.
Life is not the way it's supposed to be, it's the way it is.

Leek65
Posts: 81
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 7:39 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Low/Medium/High Volume

Postby Leek65 » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:54 pm

dg_moore wrote:Nobody knows exactly how many implants all docs perform, so you can't reallly establish exactly what high/medium/low means. I think a doc who does maybe 5 a week would be in the high range, 2 a week medium, and any less low. But the real high volume guys do many more - maybe 10 or 20 a week. In any case, the more experienced and skilled the surgeon, the less likely a poor outcome. Traveling to a good surgeon is a better bet than taking a chance with somebody local with a more modest track record.

That said I have been going to my urologist for years and he has performed other procedures on me. I find him to be a skilled and dedicated surgeon. When I asked how many of these he does he said 50 to 60 a year. That would be considered too low by many on this forum but I am happy with my results so far almost two weeks out. :)
Age 68 - AMS LGX 12+2cm. Lost over an inch from pre-ED length but thicker for what it's worth (not much). ED result of heart meds.

computerman
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:32 am

Re: Low/Medium/High Volume

Postby computerman » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:56 pm

I agree that it is better to travel to a better/more experience doctor but you also have to take into consideration if the insurance will pay for the implant or you have to pay. A few months ago, I got approved by my insurance for the implant but the only ED doctor on my health plan says that he has done less that 12 of these operations last year. That equals to once a month. I was a bit uneasy about this. Anyways, he left the health plan and now I am searching for another uro doctor. Now if I can put these 2 plans together, that would be great but unlikely.
52 yr old male. Had coloplast titan installed 3/2/16. 20cm + 1 cm extender. ED of the result of radiation treatments and testicular cancer.

dg_moore
Posts: 1885
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:34 am

Re: Low/Medium/High Volume

Postby dg_moore » Sun Sep 27, 2015 10:36 am

I don't mean to imply that docs who do fewer implants are unqualified - far from it. But statistically the odds of a successful outcome are better with a highly experienced surgeon. This is just numbers, though - like most things in life, you pays your money and you takes your chances.
Dave, 80, Maryland - Implant (Titan) 2008 by Dr. Andrew Kramer (failed Sept 2020) - never used due to a stroke that, among other things, ended my sex life.
Life is not the way it's supposed to be, it's the way it is.


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dan_bionic, IndianRasputin and 240 guests