Trading length for girth?

[Crazy_Horse]

Be careful . . . believing internet rumors.

Agreed but I'd put it a bit differently . . .
I do know about deep vs shallow cruz's. But 1cm equals 400" of an inch. It would take a 5cm difference in cruz depths to change a bone pressed erection by 2".

What does the word "cruz" mean in this context?

[Gt1956]

Agreed but I'd put it a bit differently . . .
I do know about deep vs shallow cruz's. But 1cm equals 400" of an inch. It would take a 5cm difference in cruz depths to change a bone pressed erection by 2".

What does the word "cruz" mean in this context?

Perhaps I'm using the word wrong. The proximal part of the implant. That which is inside your body is what I was getting at.

It takes a huge difference in the proximal measurement in order to account for a 2" erection length difference in two men with the same total implant length. I can not explain two men with (claimed) radically different erections length that have the same implant. The math is beyond me.

[Islanderboy58]

that's so strange... I don't think there are many explanation to your case.
probably something went wrong during the op.

by following your theory you should be much longer with the titan deflated (not inflated) but I don't think that's your case

BTW I don't think you had the AMS CXR (that is the narrow version), you probabily had the standard AMS CX

hew newhope I sent you a pm

[jl33ur]

When I had a revision which replaced a 24 cm (with .5 cm RTE) AMS CRX with a 26 cm Titan, my length went from 8” to 6.5 “. At the same time, my girth went from 5” to 6”. This has me thinking that perhaps when the internal tissues are stretched in the axial dimension, the ability to stretch in the longitudinal dimension is inversely limited. The penile volume is maintained in the trade off. I believe the titan implant is significantly wider than the AMS which explains the increase in girth. I’m just guessing at why such a length loss with the longer implant. Anyone else have this type of results?

By official measurements, I understand that AMS is the least wide of the 3, you can check the user manuals, I think it comes out... even the least, coloplast 2nd and rigicon the one that expands the most in circumference.

Everyone wants to point out the cylinder diameters for girth calculations. I personally think that is clearly a false assumption. Lots of members have posted about not getting a girthy penis with an AMS implant. But yet here I am, 6" girth with a CX. I had that girth fairly early in my recovery. I'm not the only 6" girth AMS owner here. Several have posted similar sizes. The key element to your final girth is what you historically had. I always had a 6" girth, maybe even a little more in my youth.

Statistics that I've read claim that 6" girth is on the rare side of penis girths. My opinion is that none of the implants will give a guy with a 4" girth a 6" girth after surgery. Guys that think a Titan will magically give them a huge girthy penis are chasing an unicorn. After having ED any erect dick is going to feel fat.

Choose your surgeon carefully. My dr has very few revisions needed. But he fixes quite a few failures of other drs. He only uses AMS products. But remember that AMS has two implant models while Coloplast only has one model. More AMS implants are used yearly than Coloplast implants. AMS is the leading implant line. A person could argue that they're the leading company for a reason.

Be carefull on believing internet rumors.

I'm not saying it, the official measurements say it... here you see a comparison between the Titan and an Ams, fortunately I am not married to any brand, I only like to give my opinion based on official measurements and photos and videos that I have seen. In addition to the official measurements that say that the titan expands more, I also observe in the videos and photos that the penis is less flat with the titan or rigicon than with the AMS, I am not saying that the AMS is bad, maybe it is better than these Last 2 but its width is surely not its strong point.