Not so happy story of the injection.

Sticking a needle Where? Courage, guidance and help.
JimStars
Posts: 844
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:41 pm

Re: Not so happy story of the injection.

Postby JimStars » Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:08 am

Heh,

Glad to see a picture is worth a thousand words of discussiion.

There's some twist there in the member to get a good pix so yeah it might not look like 2 or 3 o'clock but it is ...

And while writing I realized I was running outta room (was gonna write INJECT HERE!). I do usually inject near the base (things are stretched out a bit).

Soooo it may not be all that medically accurate ...

Now .. for my bigger problem .. how to explain this to the Missus when she comes home from a trip she was on? " Oh that? I was just having a joke on Frank Talk with some of the guys ... "

Or Will think of something ...

J
Last edited by JimStars on Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
RP 2008 ... MUSE 2008-9 .. TriMix Gel 2009 .. Trimix 2009-2015 ... PGE-1 2016-2019 ..Misoprostal 2019 Onward. All worked.

shipper222001
Posts: 471
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 2:00 pm

Re: Not so happy story of the injection.

Postby shipper222001 » Sun Jun 03, 2012 9:32 am

Wont it wash off? My doctor told me not to inject at 3 or 9. but 2 and 10, Did he tell you the same

danny1553
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 6:49 pm

Re: Not so happy story of the injection.

Postby danny1553 » Sun Jun 03, 2012 12:58 pm

Mine was insisting at 9. When during the training I pointed to 10 he corrected me to more towards 9... Or may be I just was at 11...

trimixtraveler
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:49 pm

Re: Not so happy story of the injection.

Postby trimixtraveler » Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:32 pm

yes 10 or 2 is it. The picture look more like 3.

perhaps the 10 and 2 recommendation is very conservative and a bigger range still work.

Question: why near the base? The closer to the base the more veins there are. I've been injecting in the middle and allway worked perfectly (12 times)

I've heard about the "near the base" advice a lot. Why is that recommended?

Thanks,

dtwarren1942
Posts: 1909
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:58 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Not so happy story of the injection.

Postby dtwarren1942 » Sun Jun 03, 2012 8:19 pm

danny1553 wrote:Thanks Shipper222001
The problem in my case is that I have quite a bad leak, so injecting in the penis without any constriction just causes medication to flush away, so I am getting the flashing face instead of the erection.
Besides, the constriction ring was my doctor advise. Now I am not sure whether I should keep trying the injection or just forget it not to cause any further damage. I sent a note to my doctor, but looks like I am writing to nowhere...

I can generate a very good erection using daily Cialis (10 mg), a pump, and an Osbon tension band. The only reason I switched to injections was to avoid the numbness and lack of sensitivity after 10 minutes when using constriction. If you are able to achieve a good erection using constriction and yet also need constriction along with the Trimix, then Trimix is not providing you with any advantage. If the above describes your situation, I would not take the risk of using Trimix.
Age 81
Diabetic
Pumping
Started Trimix injections 8/'11

dirtfrmr
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 3:38 pm

Re: Not so happy story of the injection.

Postby dirtfrmr » Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:46 am

Traveled with trimix pkg 5 times this year. no problems with security. Due to leakage of urine i weaar a pad which i take off before security and replace afterwards. The first time with pad became an actual rub down of the area before release, but no issues with that other than the delay, it just saves time in the airports. My local airport is pretty easy maybe 30 minutes, but phx airport usually takes over 60 minutes without any delays. I would always make sure I had a prescription with me as we never know what TSA will look for this time. As Spoken before shouldn't become an issue but better to be safe than sorry. Hope this Helps!

dirtfrmr

JimStars
Posts: 844
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 2:41 pm

Re: Not so happy story of the injection.

Postby JimStars » Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:13 pm

trimixtraveler wrote:Question: why near the base? The closer to the base the more veins there are. I've been injecting in the middle and allway worked perfectly (12 times)
I've heard about the "near the base" advice a lot. Why is that recommended?
Thanks,


I have a couple of reasons for near the base injects.
1) It does not hurt as much (i think) .. maybe less nerve density down there.
2) If any scarring starts to occur I think it would have less curve effect down near the base.
Scarring in the middle would definitely produce a banana.

J
RP 2008 ... MUSE 2008-9 .. TriMix Gel 2009 .. Trimix 2009-2015 ... PGE-1 2016-2019 ..Misoprostal 2019 Onward. All worked.

danny1553
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 6:49 pm

Re: Not so happy story of the injection.

Postby danny1553 » Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:11 pm

JimStars wrote:
I have a couple of reasons for near the base injects.
1) It does not hurt as much (i think) .. maybe less nerve density down there.
2) If any scarring starts to occur I think it would have less curve effect down near the base.
Scarring in the middle would definitely produce a banana.

J



I think making a shot at the base doesn't really save you from banana. I've got one while that very shot was made about 1" off the base.

dtwarren1942
Posts: 1909
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:58 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Not so happy story of the injection.

Postby dtwarren1942 » Sat Jun 09, 2012 6:59 pm

This morning I tried injecting near the base for the first time. Unfortunately, I missed the target and had to reinfect at mid shaft. I believe there is too much issue between the surface and the CC so the odds of a miss are increased.
Age 81
Diabetic
Pumping
Started Trimix injections 8/'11


Return to “Injections”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: markcatcash and 84 guests