ready2go wrote:LastHope wrote:mbambo bro,
I forgot to mention something else. I came across someone discussing that MPPs may be weaker for positions where the woman is on top, potentially leading to buckling. Is that true? How's Rigi10 performing in that position?
Those comments are always by guys who have an inflatable.
its human nature for a person to tell others, "you should do what I did"
The best of luck to those who chose an inflatable . But I won't. The one claim to fame is being able to deflate it , but then that's tempered by having to pump it 30 times and hope it does actually pump up.
Personally, I can't imagine all that hardware that's prone to malfunction being put inside me. Once would be bad enough, but the possibility of having to do it twice or more makes it a hard pass for me.
In usa with the push for inflatables, I think its about "SHOW ME THE MONEY!"
I do not think it is about money. I can't say IPP is perfect for everyone, as everyone is different and there are different types of implants because none of them fits everyone. IPP has a higher satisfaction rate because it is the most similar to the natural penis, with erected and flaccid states, but this comes at a price. More mechanical parts means more probability of failure, in addition to the need of a competent and skilled surgeon to place it.
It is more popular in the US because there are many top-class implant surgeons who can perform the surgery successfully. We rarely see failed implants performed by Dr. Eid, Hakky, Clavell, Perito, and other reputable surgeons. Outside the US, there are also excellent implant doctors, but not as many as one or two in a single country, and in some countries, not a single penile implant surgeon that we know about. Probably, because it is not talked about a lot in these countries and people don't have enough information about it. Even here, a lot of us didn't have idea about IPP or MPP before finding FT.
