Txagq8 wrote:rjnsingh98@gmail.com wrote:GoodWood wrote:
If your doctor really said “if you are able to masturbate that rules out venous leakage” you need a better doctor.
Venous leak, like every other condition, is not all or nothing. It can be anywhere on the spectrum of barely noticeable all the way through completely incapacitating.
If you have mild to moderate venous leak it’s perfectly logical you could perform in some instances (or positions) and not others.
See I am not saying this, research says it : If the patient obtains erections in certain situations (self-stimulation) without medication, he does not need additional laboratory or ultrasound assessment. His diagnosis can be made from the history alone.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837321/
Yes but the exception is that it should be full erection till discharge.
Venous leakage is a rare condition it doesn’t just happen overnight, everyone here comes with problem and suspects Venous leakage, even I suspect it i am not denying. But this just spreads health anxiety and creates the problem which is not present.
I generally don’t get testy or aggravated by posters. Once in a rare while. This website is pretty famous for the tone, the amount of help it provides, and the lack of rancor.
This morning is time for some rancor.
Rjnsingh: I think I speak for a large contingent of guys with ED in saying I do not give a flying fuck about what your medical book or research paper says.
I’m not worried about health anxiety and telling guys with ED that the problem is not present gets done a lot, and that alone makes things worse.
Think about human anatomy and physiology. All of the veins running to, from, in, and around the genitalia “leak.” Their job is to return the blood brought in by arteries back to the heart for re-oxygenation.
If the veins quit performing this function everyone would have a priapism and their cocks would go gangrenous and drop off. Not fun to think about.
What doctors call venous leakage might be a misnomer, but it’s very real. It’s also pretty simple math. Arterial inflow greater than venous output = erection. Arterial inflow less than venous output = loss of erection. I suppose a status quo of equal input and output is the normal flaccid.
This crap could result from aging, as I discovered when I went out to the track and tried to run 3 miles for the first time in a couple of years at age 68. Or it could be caused by an accident. Or it might just be someone has great big veins and even when sexually excited there’s insufficient pressure to allow enough erection to develop for the veins to get fully closed off.
I am a phlebotomist’s dream. I donate once a month, I’m an easy stick, and I fill a bag in 3 to 3.5 minutes. If there is a market for veiny dick porn I missed my calling, I could have been rich.
Perhaps I misinterpreted your goal here. My perception: you come on this website. You ask questions about VL. A number of guys provide you with sound advice based on their experiences. Then you proceed to tell us we’re wrong and some medical study says this or that.
My gut reaction: fuck your medical book or paper. Those of us who have lived this know more than the goddamned researchers.
No I am just trying to know the difference between venous leak caused by anxiety and Vl caused by medical reason. How a normal guy who is absolutely fit and one day suddenly finds that he losts the erection in between. And he already had anxiety prior to that. So is there any way person can get to know ? Or everyone is getting VL only with blink of an eye ?