moving from titan to ams cx
-
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:18 am
moving from titan to ams cx
on Tuesday I will do my revision from titan to ams cx, according to your experience, even those who directly put a cx, without any revision, in your opinion, I should expect a loss of girth/length, I should expect a much lower stiffness, an angle better/worse, I should expect more ovality or more flattening than the titan, my titan was already very oval and flat what do you think based on your experience
56, ED since 2010, pills work but not always and well, trt in progress improved but not so much, myocardial infarction january 2016, new stent september 2016, hypertension, venous on 1/23/23 titan one touch 22, no rte dottor Gabriele Antonini Italia
Re: moving from titan to ams cx
You ste jumping to conclusions. I was implanted by Dr. Clavell in January with aN AMS-LGX. I just can't imagine how anything could be much harder. It is like a steel rod when pumped to the max. I didn't lose any length or girth maybe even gained a bit. It is not perfectly round, however not far from it. I am very happy with the outcome. Think positive. The key to a great outcome is the surgeon. Just go with the best high volume surgeon you can find.
Alan
Alan
Age 74 Implanted 01/02/2024, Dr.Clavell AMS LGX, Ed for almost 20yrs. Cialis tried caused vision loss, Trimix also caused vision problems. Married 36 years.
Re: moving from titan to ams cx
This isn't my personal experience, but it reflects the average axial rigidity data in grams from 100 patients who have undergone implantation with various models.
Wishing you the best of luck with your surgery!
Please keep us updated on your progress. I’m sure you'll do great.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24085236/
Al Ansari A, Talib RA, Canguven O, Shamsodini A. Axial penile rigidity influences patient and partner satisfaction after penile prosthesis implantation. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013 Sep 26;85(3):138-42. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2013.3.138. PMID: 24085236.
Wishing you the best of luck with your surgery!
Please keep us updated on your progress. I’m sure you'll do great.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24085236/
Al Ansari A, Talib RA, Canguven O, Shamsodini A. Axial penile rigidity influences patient and partner satisfaction after penile prosthesis implantation. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013 Sep 26;85(3):138-42. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2013.3.138. PMID: 24085236.
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot_20240920-210310.png (283.43 KiB) Viewed 1680 times
Re: moving from titan to ams cx
A 248 patient study that provides interesting insights.
https://journals.lww.com/ajandrology/fu ... on.10.aspx
Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses
Otero, Javier Romero1,; Cruz, César Rojas2; Gómez, Borja García1; Geli, Joaquim Sarquella2; Polo, Jose Medina1; Castañé, Eduard Ruiz2; Antolín, Alfredo Rodríguez1
Asian Journal of Andrology 19(3):p 321-325, May–Jun 2017. | DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.172822
There were more patients satisfied with the 700CX™ (P = 0.0001).....
It seems that group 700CX™ would recommend to re-implant the prosthesis with a greater tendency....
Partner Satisfaction:
It seems that although both groups would “strongly” recommend to their partners to re-implant the PP, it seems there is a greater tendency that group 700CX™ would recommend it more than group Titan® with 69% versus 56%, respectively.
https://journals.lww.com/ajandrology/fu ... on.10.aspx
Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses
Otero, Javier Romero1,; Cruz, César Rojas2; Gómez, Borja García1; Geli, Joaquim Sarquella2; Polo, Jose Medina1; Castañé, Eduard Ruiz2; Antolín, Alfredo Rodríguez1
Asian Journal of Andrology 19(3):p 321-325, May–Jun 2017. | DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.172822
-
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:18 am
Re: moving from titan to ams cx
alans4570 wrote:You ste jumping to conclusions. I was implanted by Dr. Clavell in January with aN AMS-LGX. I just can't imagine how anything could be much harder. It is like a steel rod when pumped to the max. I didn't lose any length or girth maybe even gained a bit. It is not perfectly round, however not far from it. I am very happy with the outcome. Think positive. The key to a great outcome is the surgeon. Just go with the best high volume surgeon you can find.
Alan
based on what I have read here, it seems that the titan is the most rigid in terms of erection, I have also read a lot of users who are very happy with their ams cx, but few details such as roundness or loss/gain of length/circumference
56, ED since 2010, pills work but not always and well, trt in progress improved but not so much, myocardial infarction january 2016, new stent september 2016, hypertension, venous on 1/23/23 titan one touch 22, no rte dottor Gabriele Antonini Italia
Re: moving from titan to ams cx
Here are a few extra details for the data enthusiasts.
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot_20240921-142906.png (196.37 KiB) Viewed 1534 times
-
- Posts: 1463
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:18 am
Re: moving from titan to ams cx
LastHope wrote:Here are a few extra details for the data enthusiasts.
LastHope you are very kind to post this data for me, unfortunately I can't understand because of the language, it doesn't even let me copy, to paste into the translator, could you explain what it says
56, ED since 2010, pills work but not always and well, trt in progress improved but not so much, myocardial infarction january 2016, new stent september 2016, hypertension, venous on 1/23/23 titan one touch 22, no rte dottor Gabriele Antonini Italia
Re: moving from titan to ams cx
LastHope wrote:Here are a few extra details for the data enthusiasts.
Great news Mom! I got that job I was telling you about with that doctor doing medical device testing. My degree is finally paying off, thanks for your emotional and financial support for the past 16 years, this will be great experience!
What is it you're testing honey? I'm so proud of you! I'm sure it'll be a great contribution to society and help millions of people.
Well, I'm gathering data on how much force is needed for all sorts of different penis implants to penetrate a vagina, and then testing the force needed to enter an anus.
2/22/23 AMS 700 CX 21cm + 1.5cm RTEs. 58 yrs old, wife of 37 yrs. Penoscrotal. 100ml Conceal reservoir. Dr. Clavell. Pills failing and went right to implant, skipped the injections. 12 mos. later: 7 1/2" x 5 3/4"
Re: moving from titan to ams cx
frank66665 wrote:LastHope wrote:Here are a few extra details for the data enthusiasts.
LastHope you are very kind to post this data for me, unfortunately I can't understand because of the language, it doesn't even let me copy, to paste into the translator, could you explain what it says
You're welcome, Frank! Here are the numbers. I wrote down the averages instead of the ranges for simplicity.
Average penetration forces (in Newtons):
Vaginal - 7.85 N
Anal - 30.26 N
Average forces recorded when device buckled:
Coloplast Titan Classic - 10.47 N
AMS CX 700 - 9.66 N
Coloplast Titan OTR - 9.35 N
Coloplast Genesis (Malleable) - 8.40 N
A well-lubricated machine buckles less, so some of us must grease it up and glide through the day and night!
Re: moving from titan to ams cx
Jage64 wrote:LastHope wrote:Here are a few extra details for the data enthusiasts.
Great news Mom! I got that job I was telling you about with that doctor doing medical device testing. My degree is finally paying off, thanks for your emotional and financial support for the past 16 years, this will be great experience!
What is it you're testing honey? I'm so proud of you! I'm sure it'll be a great contribution to society and help millions of people.
Well, I'm gathering data on how much force is needed for all sorts of different penis implants to penetrate a vagina, and then testing the force needed to enter an anus.
That's funny
Let's call it IIPIS!
IIPIS - Insurance Institute for Penile Implant Safety
IIPIS is an independent, nonprofit scientific and educational organization dedicated to reducing penile implant buckling, leaks, auto-inflation, infection, erosion and extrusion, through research and education of surgeons, patients, policymakers and device safety professionals. IIPIS prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.