RoboCock69 wrote:Are you really still going to put yourself through revision surgery knowing you can tap ass like that?
100%
RoboCock69 wrote:Are you really still going to put yourself through revision surgery knowing you can tap ass like that?
ViaSwiss wrote:RoboCock69 wrote:Are you really still going to put yourself through revision surgery knowing you can tap ass like that?
100%
abhishek26 wrote:ViaSwiss wrote:RoboCock69 wrote:Are you really still going to put yourself through revision surgery knowing you can tap ass like that?
100%
What's the revision for again? To fix your tips/glans?
ViaSwiss wrote:abhishek26 wrote:ViaSwiss wrote:
100%
What's the revision for again? To fix your tips/glans?
My tips do not really go into my glans, so yes I have a bit of "floppy glans". Luckily I get really good glans blood flow, so its helps some. The revision is to attempt to fix that through a number of different possible routes.
RoboCock69 wrote:ViaSwiss wrote:abhishek26 wrote:What's the revision for again? To fix your tips/glans?
My tips do not really go into my glans, so yes I have a bit of "floppy glans". Luckily I get really good glans blood flow, so its helps some. The revision is to attempt to fix that through a number of different possible routes.
What does your original surgeon say about your outcome? He has a pretty good reputation and has trained with Dr. Perito. I can't picture him undersizing someone unless there was a reason (e.g., scar tissue buildup preventing tips from extending farther). Not saying your complaint isn't legit, just curious how he responded.
frwmw1 wrote:Hi Viaswiss, Regarding how the cylinder sits too lateral, do you know what caused it? Was the cylinder stitched in place through the glans (snake eyes)?
Thisworld wrote:ViaSwiss, how much of a residual natural erection can you still get?
Apparently for some poeple a good amount of natural engorgement can be preserved
Users browsing this forum: DaddySa, Google [Bot] and 459 guests