duke_cicero wrote:I was told by a high-volume surgeon that the risk of erosion is essentially the same between MPP and IPP.
That's interesting. It actually contradicts what's commonly found in urology literature.
Journal of Translational Andrology and Urology
Recent technological development of penile prosthesis: a literature review
Vol 13, No 1 (January 31, 2024)
"IPPs, given their increased complexity, have a greater propensity for mechanical failure. On the other hand, erosion rates were higher for malleable prostheses compared to IPPs"
https://tau.amegroups.org/article/view/120906/html